Have You Suffered Hearing Loss Because of Defective Military Earplugs?
3M provided defective Dual-Ended Combat Arms Earplugs to military service members between 2003 and 2015. These earplugs failed to protect soldiers’ hearing and have been linked to a dramatic increase in hearing loss diagnoses in veterans and active-duty service members. In July 2018, the Justice Department announced a $9.1 million settlement with 3M over allegations that the company knowingly provided defective earplugs to soldiers, rigged testing for the earplugs, and concealed the defect from the U.S. Government. This settlement only compensated the U.S. Government for its contract-related losses. Ashcraft & Gerel is now pursuing cases for individual service members against 3M to help compensate them for the hearing-related injuries caused by these earplugs.
Ashcraft & Gerel regularly represents members of the armed forces and is thoroughly investigating these claims. We deeply appreciate your service to our country and want to hold this company accountable for the damage it caused.
The Defective Product
Manufacturer: Aearo Technologies and 3M (3M purchased Aearo in 2008 for $1.2 Billion).
Product Names:
3M Combat Arms Earplugs
Dual-Ended Combat Arms™ Earplugs, Version 2 (CAEv2)
Supply Dates to US Military: 2003 to 2015
Discontinuance Date: November 17, 2015
Quantity Supplied to Military: The exact count is under investigation because Aearo and 3M entered limitless Indefinite-Quantity Contracts with the US Government. A 2006 contract proposed a minimum supply of 500,000 pairs and estimated the maximum number supplied could total as high as 2,250,000 pairs.
Other Involvements: routine training use; air base and military base use by all branches; regular use by service members in the Coast Guard, Marines, and Navy.
How the device worked: 3M Combat Arms Earplugs claimed to offer service members the benefit of two distinct types of earplugs in one unit. The Yellow (Open-End) was intended to protect against loud impulse noises while allowing the soldier to still hear critical verbal commands. The Green (Closed-End) was intended to provide constant noise protection for heavy machinery and other constant loud combat scenarios.
Design, Specifications, and Testing:
The initial complaint alleged Aearo/3M rigged product testing to make Combat Arms Earplugs seem more effective on paper to the military than the earplugs actually performed in real life.
Filings allege Aearo/3M fraudulently claimed its testing met ANSI and other material regulatory standards for ear protection the government required in its bid process.
Filings allege Aearo/3M submitted additional false claims about the effectiveness of Combat Arms Earplugs in subsequent years to renew the contract and continue its exclusive supply of defective ear protection to the military.
Yellow (Open-End) Defects:
Filings allege Aearo/3M fraudulently claimed a 0 decibel rating on the yellow open-end, and claimed this plug would allow the soldier to hear critical spoken and other audible commands in the field with the earplugs inserted while still protecting the soldier from unexpected and intermittent loud explosions.
In reality, this end did not function as promised. It reduced decibel levels and made it more difficult to hear critical commands.
Company testing on the open-end did not comply with mandatory standards and actually resulted in a facially invalid -2 decibel result (a negative result implies an “amplification” effect).
Green (Closed-End) Defects:
Filings allege Aearo/3M fraudulently put forth a 22 decibel reduction rating on the closed-end and claimed this end would provide a constant level of ear protection during continued high noise combat situations.
In reality, a known design flaw in Combat Arms Earplugs limited the amount of protection the closed end provided by approximately half the protection rating.
This flaw unknowingly exposed soldiers to significantly greater amounts of potentially damaging noise in combat.
The Design Flaw:
The double ended earplug stem is too short. It prevents the soldier from inserting either end into the ear canal correctly.
The large end flange on the unused end physically blocks the side in use from penetrating far enough into the ear.
In testing Combat Arms Earplugs, Aearo/3M employed a correction technique to overcome this flaw, where the user would physically roll back the large flange on the unused end when inserting the ear plug.
Failure to Warn or Instruct:
Warnings and Instructions provided to military personnel instructed wearers to simply “insert” the green or yellow end based on the desired usage situation.
The packaging suggests that some wearers may obtain a better fit by rolling back the first flange on the un-used side. This suggestion knowingly hid the fact that the design of the product itselfrequired the roll-back technique for soldiers to benefit from the product’s claimed effectiveness in protecting against permanent hearing damage.
Injuries Caused by 3M Combat Arms Earplugs:
Diagnoses include but are not limited to hearing loss, tinnitus (noise or ringing in ears), and deafness.
The impact of these injuries is significant. Recent estimates suggest as many as 52%-60% of veterans suffer from hearing loss. A 2015 article estimates the VA spends over $1 billion per year to treat hearing loss in 800,000+ veterans.
We’ve secured life-changing results for clients by holding powerful interests accountable.
$3 Million
Tylenol (acetaminophen) Litigation Settlements
$1.25 Million
Construction Negligence
$16 Million
Brain Injury Due to Defective Medical Device
$1.9 Million
Injury from Automobile Defect – Malfunction
$200,000
Car Accident Negligence
$2 Million
Burns from Flammable Bathrobe
$2.5 Million
Injured Forklift Operator
$2.9 Million
Child Injured at Birth – Deprived of Oxygen
$3.5 Million
Injured by Defective Helmet & Negligent Track Employees
$46 Million
Pharmaceutical Negligence
$500,000
Injured by Negligent Nursing Home
$5.4 Million
Child Injured at Birth – Umbilical Cord Compression
$640,000
Workers’ Compensation – Fall From Roof
$700,000
Injuries Caused by Defective Airbag
$735,000
Nursing Home Malpractice
$825,000
Defective Surgical Device
$850,000
Child Injured by Lead Paint in Apartment Building
I really appreciate Ashcraft & Gerel, LLP. Mr. Justin and his team, including Kable, kept me informed every step of the way and went above and beyond to secure a settlement that exceeded my expectations after my tractor-trailer accident. Highly recommend their professionalism and dedication!
Wufala D.
Outstanding work by my lawyer and his excellent assistant! This is my 2nd excellent experience with Ashcraft and Gerel!
Rose B.
Getting help is simple
We make the process easy and stress-free. Just tell us what happened, and we’ll handle the rest.
Signing up typically takes 3-5 minutes.
Our team collects the evidence needed to win your case.
We regularly update you, asking for information only when needed.
ASHCRAFT & GEREL’S ROLE IN HISTORIC TALCUM POWDER SETTLEMENT COVERED IN LAW.COM
Law.com recently reported on the historic settlement reached to resolve approximately 76,000 Johnson & Johnson talcum powder lawsuits. The uncapped agreement marks a significant milestone after more than a decade
ASHCRAFT & GEREL LLP ANNOUNCES UNCAPPED GLOBAL SETTLEMENT WITH J&J TO RESOLVE TALC LITIGATION
Ashcraft & Gerel LLP, a leading plaintiff’s law firm whose attorneys serve as both Co-Lead Counsel and as a member of the Plaintiffs’ Negotiation Committee in MDL 2738 (District of
Attorneys Applaud the Court’s Decision to Dismiss LTL Management Second Bankruptcy Attempt
Ashcraft & Gerel, LLP partners Michelle Parfitt and James Green, two of the co-counsels representing the Committee members share the thoughts expressed by the TCC committee in their public statement.
Patrick Lyons Appointed to the Leadership Development Committee on Hair Relaxer MDL
Congratulations to Patrick Lyons and the Ashcraft & Gerel team for being appointed to the Leadership Development Committee on the Hair Relaxer Marketing Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation MDL.
Ashcraft & Gerel Not Supportive of Second Bankruptcy and Claimed “Settlement”
With Ashcraft & Gerel’s Talc litigation history and hard-earned knowledge, why are we not supportive of LTL Management’s announced second bankruptcy and claimed “settlement”? As widely reported in the press,
Ashcraft & Gerel Lawyers to Speak at HarrisMartin’s Paraquat Litigation Webinar
We at Ashcraft & Gerel are proud to announce that Attorneys Michelle A. Parfitt and Patrick Lyons will be speaking at HarrisMartin’s Webinar Series: Paraquat Herbicide Litigation on Monday, May
Ashcraft & Gerel Attorneys Selected to 2021 Super Lawyers®, Rising Stars
The time of the year for Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars selections has finally arrived, and Ashcraft & Gerel is proud to announce that three of our Washington, D.C. legal
Ashcraft & Gerel Takes the Lead in Consumer Protection
Our Team Is Working Hard on Cases Involving ParaGard IUDs and Weed Killer Paraquat Ashcraft & Gerel is known for taking complex, high-profile cases in the name of consumer protection.
Attorney Michelle Parfitt Invited to Speak at MTMP 2021
Mass Torts Made Perfect Holds Bi-Annual Conferences, and Ashcraft & Gerel Attorney Michelle Parfitt Is a Frequent Speaker The current head of the Mass Tort practice section at Ashcraft &
Attorney Parfitt to Speak at NJICLE Webinar on Mass Torts, Talc
In the upcoming continuing legal education (CLE) program “Contemporary Issues in Mass Torts: Applying Lessons from Talc and Beyond,” Attorney Michelle A. Parfitt will be speaking on the current and
Ashcraft & Gerel Fights for Those Injured by ParaGard® IUDs
The Ashcraft & Gerel legal team is now accepting injury cases concerning ParaGard® copper intrauterine devices (IUDs). With more and more patients coming forward about the harm their IUD caused
Common questions about working with our legal team
How do I schedule a consultation?
Contact our office directly by phone or email. We will arrange a convenient time to discuss your legal needs.
What information should I prepare?
Please gather all relevant documents; photographs, medical records, provider contact information, incident reports, etc. prior to your consultation.
Are initial consultations free?
Yes. All case evaluations at Ashcraft & Gerel are provided at no cost and with no obligation. Call Now.
How long will my case take?
Case timelines vary depending on the complexity and circumstances of each matter, and a personalized assessment will be provided during your initial consultation with one of our attorneys.
What are your fees?
We understand the financial stress an injury can cause. That’s why we work on a contingency fee basis – you pay nothing unless we win. Our fee is a percentage of the compensation we recover for you. If we don’t win, you don’t owe us a dime. Our fees are clearly outlined in our retainer agreement, so you’ll always know exactly where you stand.
Ready to discuss your case?
Our attorneys are prepared to provide legal guidance tailored to your unique situation